Simcha1
Newbie

Offline
Posts: 1
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2008, 10:44:54 PM » |
|
R' Isaacson brought up the famous $#!@a of the Rosh, that erusin is not a mitzvah but rather a hechsher mitzvah, and that is why it gets a birkas hashevach. I heard in a shiur by R' Bezalel Rudinsky from Monsey that perhaps even the Rosh could that erusin is a mitzvah deor'. He draws a distinction between mitzvos kiyumi and chiyuvi, and only mitzvos chiyuvi would get a bracha, with the way to differentiate between the two is whether or not there is another way to perform the task at hand. The example given is shchita, and since this is only a reshus, but still gets a bracha, it must be because shchita is the only way to be matir the meat of an animal. Marrying a woman, on the other hand, is not the only way to have children, as in theory it is possible to have a concubine, so it does not get a birkas hamitzvah. It gets a birkas hanehenin, but while we're making a bracha already, we can throw in aspects of birkas hamitzvah as well. I thought this was interesting.
|